🔗 Share this article

Critics have charged British American Tobacco with “utter hypocrisy” for opposing tobacco control measures in Africa that are already in place in the UK.

Zambian lobbying efforts

Documents seen by journalists dispatched by the corporation's branch in Zambia to the African officials demands measures restricting tobacco advertising and sponsorship to be canceled or deferred.

The company is attempting modifications of a draft bill that include reductions in the suggested dimensions of graphic health warnings on cigarette packaging, the elimination of limitations on flavored smoking items, and diminished punishments for any companies violating the new laws.

Health advocate reaction

“If I was a politician, I would say that they enable the defense of the British people and sustain the fatalities of the Zambian people,” said Master Chimbala.

Over seven thousand citizens a year die from tobacco-related illnesses, according to global health agency statistics.

Chimbala said the letter was known to have been circulated to multiple official agencies and was in circulation among public interest organizations.

Global industry interference concerns

The situation emerges alongside expanded apprehension about business sector influence with health policies. In recent weeks, international health experts sounded an alarm that the smoking product companies was increasing attempts to dilute worldwide restrictions.

“There is proof of corporate influence globally. Manufacturer hallmarks are on postponed duty hikes in Indonesia, halted laws in Zambia and even a diluted statement at the UN summit conference,” stated the tobacco industry watchdog.

Likely impacts

“If a tobacco control measure fails to be approved because of this letter, the cost might be borne in lives of people who might potentially stop smoking.”

The public health measure being considered by Zambia’s parliament includes regulations surpassing UK legislation by extending coverage to e-cigarettes, and stipulating that pictorial cautions cover three-quarters of product packaging.

Company alternative suggestions

Via documentation, BAT suggests this be reduced to thirty to fifty percent “within the WHO-FCTC guideline limits”, delayed for at least 12 months after the legislation is approved.

The WHO in fact recommends a alert needs to encompass at least 50% of the product container front “and aim to cover as much of the principal display areas as possible”. Across the United Kingdom, warnings must cover 65% of a product container sides.

Flavor restrictions debate

The company seeks the withdrawal of extensive controls on flavored cigarette varieties, suggesting that it would lead smokers to “illegally traded” products. The company proposes restricting fewer varieties of “flavours based on desserts, candy, energy drinks, soft drinks and alcohol drinks”. All flavoured cigarettes have been outlawed across the UK since 2020.

The proposed legislation proposes sanctions for multiple violations “varying from a portion of yearly revenue to a decade in prison”.

Company justification

In the letter, the managing director of the Zambian branch says the corporation is focused on ethical business practices” and “endorses the aims of governments to lower tobacco use and the associated health impact” but asserts that “certain measures can have negative and unanticipated results.”

Activist reaction

The advocate stated the corporation's recommended amendments would “dilute these regulations so much that the required influence for it to create lasting transformation in society will not be achieved”.

The fact that many such provisions were present in the UK, where the company maintains its main office, was “complete contradiction”, he commented.

“We exist in a international community. Should I grow cigarettes in my property and collect the yield and market the products – and my family members avoid tobacco, but my community's youth consumes … to enrich myself and all the generations of my children while my community's youth are succumbing … is in itself complete moral bankruptcy.”

Tobacco control legislation in the UK or elsewhere had not caused companies to close, the advocate mentioned. “Legislation never shuts down the industry. It only protects the people.”

Standard business position

The corporate communicator stated: “The corporation runs its activities following with applicable local laws. Further, the company participates in the state's regulatory development in line with the suitable systems which allow for interested party involvement in regulation development.”

The firm positioned itself as “not resisting legislation”, the spokesperson stated, adding that minors should be protected from obtaining cigarettes and nicotine.

“We advocate for evolving legislation to realize planned community wellbeing objectives, while acknowledging the spectrum of privileges and responsibilities on industry, consumers and related stakeholders,” the spokesperson stated, noting that BAT’s proposals “reflect the realities of the local commercial environment and tobacco industry, which involves increasing amounts of black market activity”.

The nation's ministry of economic activities and commercial operations was approached for comment.