🔗 Share this article

Only 48 hours prior to the New York mayoral election, political analyst Michael Lange issued a significant forecast – not just who would win overall, and block by block. Lange, a political analyst who grew up in New York City, has spent more than ten years in left-leaning activism and has become a kind of well-known figure this year for his deep dives into municipal statistics and voter surveys.

He published his extremely precise forecast map – accurately predicting that Zohran Mamdani would win while missing the independent candidate’s strong performance – on his newsletter, his platform. He has a flair for witty coinages. He highlighted, for instance, the divide between the “commie corridor”, stretching from Park Slope to another area to Astoria, where he predicted (accurately) that Mamdani would triumph by huge margins, and the “capitalist corridor” on Manhattan’s Upper East and Upper West Sides. There, “the Free Press and financial newspapers outrank the mainstream paper” in audience and most voters leaned toward the independent, who ran as a moderate alternative.

Election Night Patterns and Surprises

What was your night?

It was necessary since they were dropping around 200,000 ballots into the tally every few minutes! I was actually somewhat anxious initially: The candidate led the initial ballots by a dozen percentage points, but came large groups of votes that came in later and his lead went from 12 to 8%. I was worried.

You know, it was possible where yesterday went somewhat badly for him, where Cuomo would have essentially increasing his support from the Democratic primary. But Mamdani gained 500,000 votes to his initial base, and that’s a huge reason why he succeeded. He went out and massively expanded his base from the primary.

Coalition Building

How did Mamdani gain additional support from?

He assembled the alliance that progressives long aimed for: diverse racially, youthful, it’s renters and it’s people squeezed by affordability. He gained considerably with Black and Hispanic voters, everyday New Yorkers, relative to the earlier election. Plus he further maximized his core of liberal progressives, young leftists, and immigrant groups. He couldn’t have won without making those significant inroads.

He created the alliance that the left always wanted to build: diverse, young, renters and people squeezed by affordability

Additionally, there were a number of supporters of both candidates – is this significant?

It’s definitely a real thing, confined to Hispanic laborers, Asian communities and Muslims. Voters in immigrant strongholds that went for Trump last year went for the progressive this year. However I wouldn’t say he was gaining white working-class voters and Maga voters.

Voter Participation and Effects

One of the big stories of the election was the record turnout. Who benefited?

Each candidate. Participation was significantly higher than I had expected. I thought we might go over two million, but it reached 2.3 million – which is a huge number of participants. There was a decent anti-Mamdani block, who were motivated, but the Mamdani base was also motivated, and that was enough to secure victory.

You predicted he’d exceed 50% of the vote. Is he on course for that?

Right now you would say he’s favored to get over half. He has just over 50% but remain probably 200K ballots left to report as of Wednesday morning. So I don’t think it’s definitive, but I think probable, and I wish he achieves it so afterwards none can claim Sliwa was a spoiler.

Republican Collapse

Curtis Sliwa, the conservative contender, is the other big story. His support plummeted.

He lost a single precinct in any borough. Not even Tottenville in the borough, which is like an highly conservative neighborhood. That truly surprised me. Cuomo held very white areas, very wealthy areas and very religiously Jewish areas, and then added all of these conservatives on the island with a high participation. I believe occurred a lot of strategic balloting by the Republicans. This happened prior to Trump endorsed for Cuomo, but that definitely helped. It might have changed the outcome if the winning alliance failed to expand.

Progressive Strongholds

What about your often-discussed “commie corridor” – did backing for the candidate dominant in those parts of the boroughs?

I think existed a little dilution of the progressive zone in some areas like neighborhoods that have more older white ethnic folks. There, instance, the property owners and homeowners supported the independent. So there existed some opposition. But no, largely the commie corridor is another huge reason why Zohran prevailed – he was polling between high percentages in Fort Greene, Clinton Hill and Bushwick.

Community Support

Prior to the vote we reported on if Mamdani was gaining ground with the community. Is there any suggestion that he did?

There are neighborhoods with a lot of secular and more progressive-leaning Jews – like specific locales – where he performed strongly. However in the wealthy Jewish communities like the Manhattan area, his Middle East stance was influential in those places. Likewise in the moderate communities like Forest Hills, Rego Park, or Bronx areas – they favored Cuomo. Plus, there are Jewish immigrants from Eastern Europe in southern Brooklyn, they were strongly supportive. Therefore I don’t know if existed crazy narrative-busters on this one, but he did hold more progressive Jewish neighborhoods and including sections of the another locale by big margins.

Long-Term Significance

Has Mamdani rewritten what New York means politically? Will the commie corridor become a launch pad for leftwing candidates?

Yes, it’s no coincidence that some of the biggest political leaders from the left come from a handful of neighborhoods in the boroughs. I believe that we’ll see additional examples – candidates will emerge from these areas to be promoted to higher office.

But I believe that every city in America can have their own commie corridor. Cities are the epicenters of leftwing power in the nation – because youth reside there, tenancy is common and they are places where individuals struggle by the disparities exist.